Thursday, August 14, 2008

Flower Gap ... 30 Years Later

On Monday, I went for a hike in Pisgah National Forest that marked a kind of milestone for me, as I got to return to a place in the Shining Rock Wilderness that I first visited almost exactly 30 years ago: Flower Gap.

It was here, in this picturesque spot between Flower Knob and Ivestor Gap, that 30 years ago this month, I spent the first night of my first backpacking trip: a four-day walk from Big East Fork trailhead on U.S. 276 westward toward Shining Rock and the Art Loeb Trail, then south (more or less) on the Art Loeb to end at the Davidson River Campground just outside the town of Brevard. I was twelve years old, and the youngest of four boys and two adult leaders from my Boy Scout troop in the Lowcountry of South Carolina.

Map image


Now, I live in Brevard, and at times still can't believe that I live in this place that was so much a part of my childhood. My scout troop made a number of camping trips to Pisgah over the years, and I wore out at least several pairs of cut-off blue jeans on Sliding Rock, a natural water slide and popular tourist attraction on Looking Glass Creek in the national forest. The place we normally camped was a site near the fish hatchery (where a friend of mine now works), across the Davidson River accessed by a suspension bridge. The campsite is still there, but the bridge is long gone, washed away years ago, I am told, by a flood on the river.

When I moved to Brevard four years ago, I started re-acquainting myself with these places I had first experienced as a child. Some weren't quite as I remembered them, like the fork on the gravel Forest Service road past the fish hatchery. On my first trip to the campsite on the river, I was sitting in the front of the car driven by an adult leader, but I wasn't expecting the sudden fork to the left -- and when the car took this abrupt shift down and to the left (instead of up and to the right), I just knew that we had just driven off the mountain. It was good for a pulse-pounding adrenaline moment, until of course I realized fractions of a second later that we were in fact safe, still on a road, and not tumbling off a cliff to our deaths.

When I look at that fork on the road now, I can't believe it gave me a fright. I can't even see how it was frightening; it seems downright tame. Is it just the difference of a child's viewpoint and an adult's? It is possible that the road was re-engineered; indeed, it is perhaps likely, given how the road has fared in floods. The lower road, along the river, was closed as recently as 2005 following devastating floods in the fall of 2004 when Hurricanes Ivan and Frederick washed out many bridges and roads for months; even parts of the Blue Ridge Parkway were closed because of "roadway failure." Euphemism for part of the mountain eroding away in the wash.

So some of my childhood memories of the region don't quite match the realities of today, while others are just as spectacular as they seemed then. I have now hiked many of the trails in this area, many more than I got to as a mere occasional visitor to the area, but until this week, I had not ventured to this particular location in the Shining Rock Wilderness.

Flower Gap. Except for Shining Rock itself (glimpsed, briefly, off to the right somewhere on our long hike from the trailhead on the first day of our trek), it was the first tangible named geographic point I remember from that backpack trip. I had not yet developed a love for maps and topography, or even really much of an interest in the outdoors and nature. I was twelve years old. All that was to come.

All I knew then was that when the summer backpack trip was announced at a troop meeting sometime in January or February, I was determined to go. Perhaps more so because at that moment, I did not "qualify."

The troop scoutmaster, Roger -- a bona-fide forester in his day job -- laid a few ground rules designed to spur self-improvement and development. First, in order to be eligible to go on the trip, any scout had to advance at least one rank. Second, the scout had to have reached the rank of First Class.

For me, that meant I had to advance not one but two ranks in just four or five months. I was a Tenderfoot, fairly new to the troop having just come up from Webelos. Our troop did not meet during the summer, and so I would have to get the work done, in conjunction with the BSA time requirements between ranks, by late May or early June. So I had to get started right away if I wanted to be eligible.

And so I did. I did the work, earned the requisite skill awards and/or merit badges, along with the other requirements that came with advancement of rank in scouting. Roger also required all of those who were to go on the trip to attempt at least one "shakedown" hike -- basically, a short day hike with a full pack, and a close examination afterward of what was packed, and what should not be packed in an actual backpack trip. I went on two.

It was probably a good thing, because the trip was in some ways harder than I had expected it would be. First, I was the youngest to go; Conrad and Phillip were a year older than me, and Steve was two or three years older than them. My boots were not well fitted to my feet, and I ended up with a few blisters that had to be doctored on the trail. And I was (and am) not, by nature, athletic: even though our trek on average was downhill, it was a hard slog.

So that first night in August 1978, when we arrived in Flower Gap, after eating lots of blueberries and blackberries right off the trail, it was a welcome and amazing sight, and a personal accomplishment that I am proud of even to this day. I was exhausted, could barely pitch my tent, but it was a good, honest exhaustion. My tent-mate, Steve, shared my exhaustion in part, but I don't think he was as dog-tired as I was. Conrad and Phillip, in contrast, would seem to have endless energy -- as we saw toward sunset, when some low-hanging clouds came bounding through the gap just a few dozen feet higher than us. They ran a ways up the trail onto the next ridge so that they could be "in the clouds" as they drifted past.

On Monday of this week, I descended that very ridge, along the same trail, in my approach to Flower Gap. Still not particularly athletic, I nonetheless like to hike whenever and wherever I can. I did not carry a full backpack as I did 30 years ago, but I can say with certainty that on this occasion, I carried considerably more weight than I did when I was twelve. Enough said....

There were no clouds drifting through the gap this time, but it was approaching sunset, so the time of day was similar, and it looked just as I remembered it. Dry and grassy, excellent flat spots for tents, spectacular views to the west, a feeling of exposure, a place to catch the breeze. And solitude -- Shining Rock Wilderness as a whole is suffering from too much love, becoming in effect almost an oxymoronic wilderness, but on this Monday evening, with a cold front moving through (temperatures were already in the sixties, and would be around 55 shortly after the sun went down), I was not disturbed by any intrusions of people. The only evidence of others I encountered in fact -- and it was a disgusting bit of evidence -- happened when I began to leave, cutting down the side of the ridge to the more level Ivestor Gap Trail to return to my car: where someone had chosen to have a bowel movement, without burying it, and had violated one of the key tenets of Leave No Trace ethics -- they had even left the dirty toilet paper right on the ground. At least, they hadn't left it right in the middle of the gap.


Wednesday, July 30, 2008

July's End


July was quite a month. A trip to Berea, Kentucky, for a workshop on using Sakai, two trips to my parents' house in S.C. (to drop off and to retrieve our dogs, among other reasons) ... lots of travel. A bit of vacation as well, in going to the beach at Hunting Island State Park, on a barrier island near Beaufort, S.C. It's my favorite beach, and home of my favorite lighthouse. (It's comparable in height to the one on Cape Hatteras, N.C., but I've not been to that one yet, so for now, Hunting Island still reigns.)

It's good to be back home, and back to work, since the fall semester is looming. It promises to be a very busy academic year, both in my teaching responsibilities and other professional and academic commitments. Here lately, I have been working on some scholarly articles, with hopes of circulating them in journals over the next few months. And I have been spending a lot of time trying to better understand what is collectively called "Web 2.0," and its potential ramifications for teaching and learning.

To that end, I have set up a public "Netvibes" page, to be used in conjunction with some of the courses I am teaching this fall, to see how it might work. It's online at www.netvibes.com/padgett. I have included tabs on educational technology and political news, along with a few other areas of potential interest, and will likely be adding a few more as time gets closer.

Thursday, June 26, 2008

Searching William Faulkner

Google continues to amaze me. I discovered a capability the other day -- actually, a by-product of creating this blog, to be honest -- that allows users to set up a "Custom Search" that will release the search results within a page within your own web site. And the icing on the cake: you can specify WHICH sites to search within.

So I set up what I am calling (for now) the "Faulkner Consolidated Search," which I've incorporated into my Faulkner Web site. The search looks for items within William Faulkner on the Web as well as my other primary Web project, The Mississippi Writers Page, but it also searches Faulkner Web sites maintained by others, including the William Faulkner Society, the Center for Faulkner Studies at Southeast Missouri State University, the Web site for The Faulkner Journal, two international Faulkner centers in Japan and France, and a few other sites which focus on Southern studies and/or literature.

I'm really quite fascinated by it.

The actual search box is represented below. Try it! (The results will load in my Faulkner Web site.)

Custom Search

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Political Journalism and the '08 Races

This fall, I will be teaching a special topics journalism course titled "Campaign Coverage '08," which will focus on the presidential race of course, but also the myriad smaller races. (Click here for a flyer with more information about the course.) It's already been quite a fascinating race, on both the Republican and the Democratic sides -- John McCain's near-miraculous "comeback" from his moribund and all-but-over race for the Republican nomination, and especially the epic 15-round bout between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton for the Democrats.

In fact, one of the challenges of this course is that by the time the class actually starts in mid-August, so much will already have occurred. I hope that doesn't prove too much of a hurdle ... and I hope the students in the class are at least paying some attention to what's going on (and has been going on).

In the meantime, I am collecting articles and links that may be of interest. I saw today that this week, The New York Times' political editor is answering questions from readers, including naturally the grand-daddy of all questions: that of "bias" for or against a particular candidate. I thought his answer had some pretty good points:

In my view, all journalists bring their own subjective views and individual experiences along with them whenever they tackle a story. Sometimes that means ideological assumptions or political preferences. Sometimes it means personal judgments about a public figure, based on something as big as a politician's accomplishments or as small as whether he or she returns a reporter's phone calls.

Certainly in this election cycle we've had to be on high alert: that Senator John McCain's willingness to chat up the press, for example, did not lead anyone to fall into the tank for him; that the sheer excitement and energy surrounding Mr. Obama did not become seductive; and that our editorial page's decision to endorse Mrs. Clinton in the Democratic primary did not lead to a perception that the news pages were following suit. The addition of race and gender to the political equation in a big way forced us to be that much more sensitive to real or perceived biases.

There are all kinds of internal and external checks on bias and personal preference. Editors like me have the primary responsibility to identify bias, and we take that job seriously. And while I would not dispute the longstanding assertions that there are more political liberals in newsrooms than conservatives, our political staff, as best
I can tell, represents all kinds of backgrounds and beliefs, and because we all work so closely and in such a fishbowl, we all tend to keep one another on the straight and narrow.

Of course, you can take even fairness too far. We're not interested in balancing our coverage by putting our fingers on the scale, so that we artificially maintain an equivalent number of, say, positive Obama and Clinton stories. And we don't want to judge every political pronouncement or policy proposal equally worthy — sometimes they demonstrably are not and should be called out for what they are.

Monday, June 23, 2008

George Carlin, 1937-2008

First Tim Russert, and now George Carlin. Jon Stewart said it pretty well on the Daily Show tonight: I too am getting pretty tired of losing people we need.

I may post on Russert at some other time, especially as I will be teaching a journalism course in campaign coverage this fall. This post is all about Carlin, a comedic genius whom I have valued for a long time for his views on "soft language." Years ago, when I was teaching English classes at Clemson University, I even showed one of Carlin's HBO specials to a class for what he had to say about the power of language. And this past semester, Carlin made another appearance in a class on mass media that was "linked" to a political science class on First Amendment freedoms. His "Seven Words" routine (from the Class Clown album, which I have owned for years) are of course significant to First Amendment issues, forming the basis of a Supreme Court decision, FCC v. Pacifica.

He will be missed.

Update: Here is an op-ed piece by Jerry Seinfeld in the New York Times about his friend George Carlin. Amazingly, he reveals that he and Carlin had been joking about death (following the deaths of Tim Russert and Bo Diddley) only days ago ... and that as a result, Carlin felt "safe" for a while. And Richard Zoglin published this piece on "How George Carlin Changed Comedy" in Time magazine.